I've made no secret here of the fact that I supported Clinton, and that Obama has yet to gain my confidence; regardless, I believe that the best hope for our nation lies in Democratic control of the government, because we're in a hell of a mess. And yesterday, that was the theme of one diary in myDD.com to which I posted some comments; the diarist ended by posing the question "what can we do?".
My intent is to answer that question, and I started by proposing some of "my" answers in one comment. But first, I need to work through a bit of my own political - or perhaps social - belief system.
The diarist was suggesting that we're in such a financial mess that no one - Obama included - might be able to get us out of the mess without sacrificing some of the things progressives believe in, including what the diarist referred to as "entitlement programs".
I made three comments in that diary, two of them relevant to this one: the one mentioned above, which I'll get to, but in my first comment, I expressed some dismay at the idea that a self-described progressive seemed to have "bought in" on the Republican meme/talking point of "entitlement" programs. The diarist actually used the words "entitlement spending spiraling out of control", particularly with regard to things like Medicare.
I didn't disagree with the diarist that we're in a heck of a mess; we are. But I do believe that basic programs like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and some forms of welfare program are, or should be viewed as a part of our social compact, rather than "entitlement". And that Universal Health Care is something that should never be put on the table and negotiated away by the progressive movement. To me, that means social programs need to be well-managed, that such services go to people who have either earned them or need a safety net; people who need that safety net also need to receive some sort of additional support - training, education, etc.
The diary from yesterday that I'm referring to struck a chord with me for an altogether different reason, too: yesterday morning, as I usually do, I was listening to NPR while putzing around getting ready for work and my day; one of the news articles was by NPR reporter David Greene, who was in New Orleans. His story was, theoretically, focused on politics and "courting the Latino vote". However, in the story, he noted that illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico, had flooded into New Orleans to take jobs rebuilding the city, and that many blacks were feeling displaced, perceiving that jobs are being "stolen" from them.
The reason the aforementioned diary and the term "entitlement" struck a chord with me was because the term "entitled" was used in the story, by a contractor - a Latino, US citizen, who hired both illegal Latino workers and African American workers; the contractor bent over backwards trying to avoid coming across as racist, and expressed discomfort with what he was saying, but the point he felt he had to make was that his black employees didn't work as hard as the illegal immigrants and that he perceived them as feeling "entitled" to work over the illegal immigrants.
There's more depth to it that that, of course, and you can and should listen to the podcast here - it's only about 8 minutes long.
Uncomfortable? Yeah. Talking about race relations in this country is always uncomfortable. But all of this feeds into the debate over what Republicans have negatively labeled "entitlement programs" and my theories on our national social compact.
But, the point of my second comment was to pose my answers to the diarists question: "What can we do?"
I think there's a lot that a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress can do, but we have to recognize that they're politicians; no politician is perfect and all politicians need one of two things: to know that voters "have their backs" or to have their feet held to the fire. A Dem controlled government, even for eight years, will need both of those, to remedy the mess we're in. Will it mean looking at programs which support our social compact? Yes. But there's a hell of a lot more gone wrong, and is fixable than that. Years of Republican dismantling of our economy, our political and social structures. And Democrats, in control, can repair and rebuild those.
So here's my set of original list with an addition from another commenter:
--start original--
Not to have been totally negative in my first comment - I agree with Indie that there are things that can be done to address this - the real question is whether or not enough Democrats will bite the bullet.
1) return the tax codes to some semblance of sanity, including taxing the wealthy and the corporate world at their truly fair levels;
2) punish those corporations that have set up fake off-shore headquarters to avoid taxes;
3) pass legislation that sets reasonable limits on corporate profiteering/greed;
4) re-establish genuine but reasonable regulatory processes over the financial world and US stock and commodities markets;
5) re-think the most extremely generous cases of free-trade;
6) create a credible, logical and achievable energy policy which is not dictated by big oil, big auto, big sugar, big corn;
6) recognize the importance of our allies and return to an era of international political negotiation and collaboration;
7) deal with China and Russia in the above ways (negotiation, collaboration and fair, but firm trade policies;
8) recognize that we don't really need to be the world's police force and our military doesn't need to be spread all over the world; in conjunction with this, demand that our allies begin to fund more of their own national defense needs, and stop the US subsidization of their defense.
For starters.
--end original--
And, with a h/t to Susan from 29 for this great addition:
"Seriously, I would add a full scale review of the no-bid contracting system, with an eye towards prosecution for war profiteering that would include huge fines as well as jail time for the guilty."
My list is not exhaustive; feel free to make additions or critique it.Cross-posted at myDD.com






